Matus1976 - Philosophy, Science, Politics,Art

ScienceAugust 23, 2009 4:13 am

As many of you know, I was recently involved in a pretty serious motorcycle accident. I T-Boned a Dodge Intrepid doing around 30mph, and was thrown over the car Below are the details of it, the bike involved in it, the circumstances of the accident, what I learned about motorcycling safety from it, some innovations that came from it, and my own Animated recreation of the actual crash in an attempt to understand my perplexing injuries.

The last major project on the old V-Strom – the Givi Top case with integrated brake lights. Very niiice. This adds significant visibility to your vehicle, and distinguishes it clearly as a motorcycle. Unfortunately I couldn’t quite get the wiring right! When I hit the brakes, the lights TURNED OFF! I don’t know how I would even do that If I wanted to! For the purposes of the ride, I very disappointingly left them disconnected, since lights turning OFF (just the case lights) when I hit the brakes was probably more confusing and dangerous then the benfit as running lights they offered.

Ready to embark on the trip, the tank bag with laptop / tablet GPS, here with it’s water protective cover. My modified seat with extra cushion, hydrophilic cover and hydrophobic spacer, the Givi side cases and Givi top case.

Me! Ready to go! The yellow shirt is a knit Kevlar mesh. Comfortable but highly abrasion resistant.

About an hour later I got into an accident. The result =/

Ouch! My poor V-Strom! And me, I was pretty banged up.

The circumstances are as follows – I entered an intersection traveling approximately 30 mph (my estimate) this was in a 45 mph zone. The light, according to witnesses, had ‘just turned’ red. In the intersection I hit almost dead on a blue Dodge Intrepid, which was traveling perpendicular to my direction of travel. For the light to have just turned red, and for this car to all ready be in the intersection – it must have darted immediately out or, seeing the light on their direction of travel was about to turn green, kept up a high velocity. Either way, it was in the middle of the intersection I entered. The police report indicated where the car was towed, I went there and found it - Here is the car I hit

According to the officer I picked the report up from, my bike hit their car and came to a dead stop, but the car was hit hard enough that it rotated the position of the car 90 degrees on the road. Initially he told me I hit the driver DOOR, which worried me, doors don’t have stellar records for preventing intrusions and thus major injuries, but this picture shows otherwise, I hit the frame between the front and the rear door, which explains the very small amount of intrusion of the wall of the car into it’s cabin (A good rating on Intrusion according to the NHSTA is when the door does not pass the outer edge of the steering wheel, a ‘poor’ score the door would pass the midline of the steering column) In this case, intrusion was not more than a few inches, even though I hit the car pretty hard. Instead the momentum was transferred via the frame directly to the rest of the car, hence the rotation of 90 degrees, instead of the door crumpling and me ending up on the drivers lap! The officer said the driver suffered scratches from the flying glass but as far as he knew nothing serious, she was more concerned about how I was doing, and I am very glad to hear she suffered few injuries.

Consider this picture of the front forks of my bike

The solid green line is the path the forks SHOULD follow, here the dotted line shows their actual orientation now, they were bent pretty good in this crash. Note these are 2” steel tubes. This is a good 3 or 4 degree bend at the lower tree.

My poor VSTROM!!! =(

Vehicle designers like to try to make the fronts of vehicles look like faces, my poor bike here looks like a hawk that has had the crap beaten out of it.

This is the Steering Column – note the curvature of the tube. Again, that’s some pretty serious force, the steering column is usually about 3” tubing with ¼” wall (my guess) This is what makes the bike totaled, the steering column is directly welded to the frame, and since it is collapsed and cracked, the handlebars / fork can not turn, and the column can not be replaced without cutting the whole frame up – you might as well build a new bike.

Last, look at the gas tank. I still can not figure out the circumstances here, this dent for the most part is on the RIGHT side of the tank. The area of ME hitting the tank here would have been my GROIN – but I suffered no groin injuries at all. My LEFT leg was bruised on the inner thigh, but this is on the RIGHT side of the tank! - ?? That’s a heck of a dent. This also is underneath my tank bag, which was mounted to the bike through two strong nylon seat belt like straps.

Groin injuries are very common in motorcycle accidents, and I was aware enough of this to weigh it when bike shopping. The most pressing influence on severe groin injuries (by severe, I’m talking about a SPLIT PELVIS, which usually involves not walking for a year or more) is a very steep tank angle. Look at most sport bikes and you see this –

My V-Strom by comparison, looks like this

For starters, the seat cushion itself rises with the tank for the first part of it – which the brunt of the force would take place. Then it rises *gently* at about 30 degrees. Contrast that to the Honda CBR600RR (red) above, which starts with no padding at a RIGHT ANGLE to the seat. The Hayabusa and Ninja aren’t much better.

Motorcycle Consumer News (probably the best Motorcycle magazine) did a study on motorcycle tank to seat angles against pelvic and groin injuries, and found, not surprisingly, the steeper the tank angle to the seat, the more severe the injuries.

My V-Strom, however, had an extra cushion added ? and so looked more like this

Which you can see here

I think this gentle seat angle of the V-Strom as well as my added seat cushion is what granted me NO pelvis, hip, or groin injuries. Amazing considering that dent on the tank.

The gentle slope helped significantly, and the extra cushion actually put me just above the gas tank, it seems.

So, what injuries DID I suffer?

Here is a quick representation of them

From top to bottom, I had a bloody nose, my helmet chin strap cut my chin up, nothing significant though. I had some kind of major injury on my upper right chest, a bruise was not apparent until 3 days later, but this continues to cause me the most discomfort, breathing deep, laughing, or worst of all, hiccupping, cause severe shooting pain. This must have been a significant muscle tear or pull on the muscles that overlap ribs. My lower left abdomen / rib cage has a similar injury though not as severe. The inside of my left arm has a deep yellow and purple bruise about 5 inches long. Not sure what caused this. My left leg, inner thigh, upper has a very deep purple bruise and my left inner thigh has the largest bruise I’ve ever had in my life to date. Those bruises are below. My right knee suffered something serious, it’s still significantly swollen, I don’t have full range of movement yet, and there is still some numbness in it. Also my lower right leg has a light bruise that covers the whole shin area. And my left ankle has no bruising but feels almost sprained.

Left leg, above knee, inner thigh. This is about 14” long.

Left leg, inner thigh, just below groin. Hmm, this looks suspiciously like, and is of similar size to… a Handgrip! Weird.

Lets take another look at my injuries chart compared to safety gear. Outlined in Blue is my riding gear, helmet, textile jacket, and boots.

Well, I think this shows a pretty clear trend. Where I had riding gear, I had few significant injuries. Where I had none (legs) I suffered the worst injuries. This is pretty common, the most common place of injury for motorcyclists is the legs, and this is also the place that motorcyclists are least likely to wear protective gear. Obviously in this case I am guilty of this as well, even though I was fully aware of this. I had a good set of riding pants that I was going to put on as soon as I got to my brothers house before embarking on the full trip to Chicago. This was textile gear (high strength nylon thread called "Cordura" which is better than leather for abrasion resistance yet can be woven into a light netting) with armor in the knees and hips. The biggest reason, I think, that motorcyclists don’t don leg gear more often is that it is entirely cumbersome to take on and off. Where as a jacket and helmet can be thrown on in a few seconds, pants take a good minute or two to pull on over your boots and zip up and fasten.

Either way, I don’t think the riding pants would have made much difference on the bruises on the insides of my legs, but I think that knee injury would have been much much less severe.

Taking another look at my gear, I added the placement of the armor of the jacket and boots.

Here something else shows up, I had NO injuries where armor was present. Some places armor would be unwieldy, like the inside of the upper arm. But that chest injury, which I think came from hitting my windshield, there certainly could be armor there, and in the abdomen. I’m adding this to my future modification list (perhaps I’ll just get some motocross armor and cut it up and put it inside the jacket)

So, lessons learned, wear full riding gear (even though I had much more than motorcyclists typically do, which the medical personal frequently commented on) and add armor in strategic places to that armor. I’ll have to research this a little more but it seams reasonable enough.

-Accident Recreation-

So, what I’ve been wondering is what actually happened as far as me hitting parts of my bike, given the placement of the injuries, it’s very hard to piece together. Here is what is known

Me – Severe RIGHT knee injury Upper Inner LEFT thigh major bruise upper leg inner LEFT thigh major, large bruise Upper LEFT arm inside significant bruise Upper RIGHT chest, major injury Lower LEFT leg distributive light injury Helmet – abrasion and impact, left side I came to rest far to the left side of the bike and the car, according to police report diagram

Motorcycle - RIGHT side of tank, major dent LEFT side case took major blow, bike probably ended up falling onto left side motorcycle stopped after hitting car, fell over

What is very curious is that huge dent in the tank, being on the RIGHT side of the tank, and yet my LEFT thigh being bruised. The fact that the upper thigh injury looks a lot like the handgrip got me thinking. After some deliberation I believe this is a reasonable estimate of what occurred.

1) As I hit the car, the bike and car being at angles with respect to one other, the motorcycle was violently forced to the ground, falling over to the left. 2) My body, however, continued forward with it’s forward momentum, but also picked up some lateral momentum from the bike being forced violently to fall over 3) With the motorcycle now at an angle, and in the process of falling over, my LEFT INNER LOWER thigh hits the tank bag and left side of the gas tank, since the bike is being forced violently to fall to the left, my right thigh does not hit the gas tank. a. This does not dent the gas tank, but gives me a good bruise, but also forces my left leg to spread further. The tank bag mat is ripped up and to the right, since I hit it from the left. b. This gives my body significant lateral momentum, taking away from forward momentum. c. The Gas Tank and Tank bag also give me some upward momentum. d. When my lower body hit the gas tank, my upper body folded forward and my arms reached far forward 4) I am still traveling forward, but now also traveling up and sideways. My hips and rip cage are folder slightly, my arms outstretched forward. a. At this point my far outstretched LEFT arm hits the LEFT MIRROR of the motorcycle, breaking it and giving me the bruise in my upper left arm. b. Shortly after that, my LEFT UPPER THIGH actually hits the LEFT HANDGRIP! Giving me the major bruise on my upper thigh looks like a handgrip. 5) I am traveling forward, upward, and to the left, while the bike is falling rapidly down and to the left. My left leg has just hit the handgrip, stopping the forward momentum of the left side of my body almost immediately! The result is the right side rapidly rotates. Here is where the Knee injury and gas tank dent come from. a. With the tank bag now torn off and my left upper inner thigh hitting the left handgrip, my entire body now rotates very rapidly around the point of impact of my left thigh, essentially swinging my leg and knee around an arc and ultimately I pound the gas tank with my KNEE! Giving it the one massive dent it had and my major Knee injury. 6) Around this same time, as my body is rotating with my right side moving forward and my whole body yet still moving forward, my upper chest impacts the top of my givi windscreen, concentrating a large force in a small area on my chest.

Other than that, the ankle, shin, and helmet injuries I think came from landing on the ground and sliding. Ultiamtely this is the only scenario I can think of that explains the left leg bruisies, the right side of the gas tank dent, and the knee and chest injury.

Here is a quick little animation I did while trying to understand this, my not so dramatic recreation of my motorcycle accident

http://http://.youtube.com/watch?v=lc95s6k4uW

-Safety Suggestions-

Well, all of this suggests some safety modifications to me, some simple, some elaborate.

Breakaway handlebar grips – Fasten the handgrips using nylon or UHMWPE plastic, so if you hit the grips, the grips break off by shearing the bolts. But under all normal conditions they are held as tightly as a steel tube would.

Liner for windscreen – I think my chest hit either the edge of the windscreen or the right side mirror. This suggests a wide liner on the edge of the windscreen or mirror would be good. Ultimately the mirrors should be moved and placed on the cowling anyway.

fastening to vehicle – All this makes me think some mechanisms which fastens you to the vehicle, BUT breaks away and in the process takes away much of momentum would be very valuable. Such a system might be two teathers that attatch to your bike frame and to your jacket, which has adequate wide strapping sewn into it. The tethers could be weighted to break at various levels of force. I think this is worthy of some research.

Small air bags – Honda has all ready started experimenting with small air bags on their Goldwings, the purpose of these, again, are to take away much of the momentum of your body gently, this significantly reducing injurires.

Very low center of gravity – A low center of gravity would help keep the bike stable in an accident, and make it much harder to do wheelies and stoppies. But a high center of gravity is preferable for sport bike and quick, agile performance. Thus a system which gives you a low center of gravity only under rapid deceleration would be preferable. In My case, I believe the large amount of extra weight added to the vehicle helped to prevent it from actually flipping over the car I was impacting, but the geometry of the crash and car did as well.

Accessory / periphery shedding – aircraft are made to break apart on impacts, but not the fuselage or cabin, only the wings, tails, engines, etc. This is to reduce the momentum of the vehicle which carries the occupants so they can be stopped easier. Windshields, cowlings, cases, could be made to sheer off with nylon bolts, as long as they are not in your path. This will make the vehicle with you on it lighter and easier to stop.

hypextension limiting safety gear – I had few bruises, no broken bones, and many of my bruises did not actually hurt (such as the two on my thigh) yet I was in a lot of pain and very very sore, virtually every joint was sore. This suggests to me that injuries were primarily hyperextension of my joints and or torn muscles.

Chest armor plates – a simple and easy addition would be small hard overlapping armor plates in my jacket covering parts of the chest

-Culpability-

Ultimately I was issued a ticket for running a red light for $143. One of the witness accounts stated the light had just ‘turned’ yellow, why would the other vehicle all ready be in the middle of the intersection? There must have been some confusion about this, one of the EMT’s said the car ran the red light. I don’t remember at all, but I know I was quite tired and was not paying as full attention as I should be in such a situation – I was on my way to my brothers house just a few minutes away to take some rest there. My lessons – always wear leg gear and also never ride if at all tired! (duh!)

-Postscript–

I’m awaiting my insurance check and shopping for a new bike, it will probably be the same model since I can transfer my accessories directly to it, and I loved that bike. I’m always confronted with looks of disdain or condescension when referencing motorcycling. At a recent family gathering a friend of a family member was there and chiding that motorcyclists were just organ donors to be, this he said while puffing away on a cigarette. Motorcycling has an unreasonable reputation regarding safety, consider smoking is about 5 times more dangerous than motorcycling is, for instance, in terms of average years taken off your life. And an average alchohol habit is as unhealthy and as dangerous as smoking is, yet get little attention. Furthermore, the perception of safety in motorcycling is an average of safety minded individuals and irrational irresponsible people who speed, at night, while inebriated, without any safety gear. Were motorcycling statistics made up of only safety minded folks who never the less get in accidents and injured or killed, the numbers would be far far lower. Some 80% of Motorcycle fatalities are SINGLE VEHICLE ACCIDENTS and the majority of those involve alcohol and no helmets. Averaging the perception of safety of motorcycling over helmeted riders and non-helmeted riders, for instance, is absurd. Non helmeted riders are some 10 – 20 times more likely to die if they do get in an accident. Personally, I don’t drink, or smoke, and as such live a life with a higher safety margin than your average person who does EITHER of those (not both) but never the less has a paralyzing fear of motorcycling. And within the context of motorcycling, I am a very safety minded rider. My gear and modifications significantly reduced my injuries in this incident, though much was pure luck. Moreso, this was an entirely avoidable incidence and was due to at least in a major part from a lack of rational judgment on my part. In 8 years I have not dropped my bike a single time, until this accident, and have never had a speeding ticket or citation, and routinely practice emergency stopping and swerving techniques. I ride defensively and attentively, I’m fully confident that I’ll never be involved in an accident even remotely as bad as this because I will never commit this judgment lapse again and undertaken with reasonable care motorcycling can be enjoyable and safe.

Whatever might happen in the future, know I don’t regret for one moment getting involved in motorcycling, I’ve encountered nothing more liberating and indeed intellectually exhilarating and personally rewarding. Originally I started motorcycling purely for pragmatic reasons, but I’ve turned out love it. There is no finer example of advanced technology as the product of the most ingenious minds through centuries to the average person than a motorcycle and nothing more representative of productive human effort in a physical manifestations than the technology and ingenuity that goes into putting that power, technology, and sophistication into such a tiny package. While I believe there is much more to be done still with such vehicles, they are never the less the highest manifestation of technological achievement available to the average man and immersing myself in them, operating and even designing and building one has been an immensely fulfilling and rewarding endeavor

ScienceAugust 4, 2009 2:33 am

Four months of swine flu deaths finally equal 1 seasonal flu day. See: http://bit.ly/v1fB6

Philosophy, Emotions, LoveJuly 29, 2009 11:38 pm


Matus1976 Podcast Update - E10 - Comments on Love with excerpts from the Novel – “A Ship Made of Paper” http://tinyurl.com/kremjf

ScienceMay 25, 2009 5:49 pm

In my pursuit of gradually converting my V-STROM into a long distance touring vehicle, I’ve recently made some good upgrades to it. One is simply a larger windscreen, and the other is a Tablet PC converted to a GPS Tracking module and mounted on a Tank Bag!

Before these modifications – I used the bungee spider web neeting as a convenient way to quickly hold things, such as maps.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010845.JPG

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010846.JPG

On my last trip, my printed google map blew off my bike in mid ride in a place I had no maps for. Frustrated with that, and realizing how much I’ve spent on maps, I decided to get a GPS Module. However, motorcycle GPS modules are quite pricey. I realized that I keep my tablet PC with me anyway, and that GPS receivers alone only cost $20 - $40. So the result was getting a tank bag and map bag and mounting my laptop to the tank bag with the GPS module so it becomes a real time full screen electronic map! The results were a rousing success!

1st though, the new GIVI Windscreen.

Before -

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010897.JPG

After

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010898.JPG

Very nice, wind noise was reduced drastically and I feel no turbulence on my helmet at all now. The Givi screen is taller and wider, but among all the after market screens I think it has the best style too it, keeping the curve and feel of the V-Strom.

On to the GPS setup.

After researching tank bags I settled on the strap mount Tourmaster T-12, moderate sized and stylish. For mounting the laptop, I needed a larger bag that the laptop would fit, and came across TourRiggs large map bag, at 16"x12"

First modifcations are to the Map bag, these bags usually seal up tight and have a vinyl cover to protect the map. The Wacom tablet pens used on tablet PC’s are very cool in that they used inductive loops so don’t need to actually touch the screen of the laptop and work perfectly fine through the vinyl cover.

Here is the map bag with holes cut out of it’s backing for ventilation for the laptop.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010847.JPG

Flipping it over, I want to add spacers so that it ‘floats’ above the tank bag leaving plenty of room for air to swirl around under the laptop.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010848.JPG

To hold the spacers I used some light nylon sewn into a long hollow rectangle.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010849.jpg

Here the spacers are inserted into the nylon sock

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010850.JPG

sewn closed in front of and behind foam spacers

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010851.JPG

both spacers now sewn onto the back of the Map bag

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010853.JPG

They were able to move side to side to much, so I added small adhesive Velcro to both the spacer and the bottom side of the back of the map bag to keep them in place.

Here I added a side strap and a zipper attachment for connecting to the tank bag. You can also see how much the spacers are able to move side to side

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010854.JPG

The laptop now nice and cozy inside the bag

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010855.JPG

closer view of the underside with the foam spacers and the holes cut out for ventilation

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010856.JPG

the other side of the map bag also has spacers so the laptop floats above the backing of the map bag, again to help increase airflow.

I opted for the strap mounted tank bag, unfortunately these allowed for a great deal of side to side movement no matter how tight I made the straps. The map bag came with power full rare earth magnet mounts which just stick to your metal gas tank. I decided to sew those onto the tank bag to give it laterally stiffness, so the tank bag is now both strap and magnetic mounted.

Here you can see the map bag, now laptop bag, without the laptop. You can clearly see the ventilation holes and the spacers on the laptop side of the base.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010894.JPG

The tank bag slides down easily revealing the gas cap by just disconnecting the front two strap latches. The magnetic flaps keep it in place quite well. http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010895.JPG

Here is the underside of the map bag, now the laptop bag, you can see the spacers, the front and side nylon Velcro straps, and the zipper which keeps it attached. This is a separating sport zipper to it separates completely.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010892.JPG

The Velcro side strap holds the bag down nice and tight. Here you can see the magnetic flaps that were added protruding down as well. http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010890.JPG

At the front is another Velcro strap, 3 points of connection should keep the laptop nice and stiff. http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010891.JPG

Pics of the the whole assembly mounted. http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010889.JPG

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010888.JPG

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010887.JPG

Now it’s on to powering the unit. Here are the gizmos for powering it. On the left is the Powerlet plug, these are like cigarette lighter plugs but better and smaller. In the middle is an adapter which converts from Powerlet to a regular automotive type cigarette lighter plug, because the converters needed to power the laptop AC unit only come with those connectors. Next to the right is the power block, this plugs into your battery positive terminal and has six attachments points for later accessories and each has it’s own slot for fuses. It wasn’t necessary for this, but when I add more components it will be. Last on the right is the main relay switch and fuse, this is actually what directly connects to your battery and the power block attaches to it. The relay opens up the 30A from the battery to your accessories but uses a small current to actually throw that switch. Relays basically use small switches to close big switches making the whole setup more reliable and safer.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010900.JPG

The instructions say to find a suitable place to mount your power block, I removed the seat and found plenty of secure shielded room there. The seems to be exactly where virtually everyone finds to mount power blocks like these. On the left with the large red rubber cap is the battery, just to the right of that is the fuse for my accessory device, to the right of that is the relay, and then to the right of that is the power block. Above center is my grounding block, made from Ultra High Molecular Weight polyethylene (the coolest stuff ever – used for medical implants and as lighter than water bullet proof armor!) In hindsight, I probably shouldn’t have my grounding block so close to my positive power block, I’ll move it.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010906.JPG

At this point the relay switch needs to be connected to something that turns on when you turn your key on. Most people connect this to your rear taillight which is always on in motorcycles. Lacking any easily accessible screws or mounts, I used a T crimping terminal which you just clamp around an insulated wire, it cuts through the insulation and makes contact with the wire, then you can just plug another connector to that.

Here is the rear tail light assembly removed, I had to remove my Givi side case mounting bars to get this off.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010902.JPG

I confirmed which wire was the constant on wire using a multimeter - it’s the solid grey one. The red probe from the multimeter is sticking into the wire nut on the right.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010904.JPG

Purple T crimp is clamped onto the grey wire, in my hand is the plug which connects to that, now creating a new circuit.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010905.JPG

After that, I reconnected the ground, added the fuses, and tested it out. Here is the multimeter showing power in my Powerlet plug

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010908.JPG

I drilled a mounting hole for the powerlett plug.

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010909.JPG

Plug installed! http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010910.JPG

Wiring added. Obviously that little 6" plug was not enough to get to my tank bag, so I wound my own and gave it Velcro attatching points to the frame. Wrapping the adhesive Velcro around the wire, making quick and easy cabling which can be removed possible. http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010912.JPG

The wire goes under the tank bag base and comes out on the right. Now, everything’s ready! http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010911.JPG

Power up and running off the motorcycle’s electrical system! Woo hoo!!! http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010914.JPG

http://www.matus1976.com/public/pictures/25_05_09/P1010917.JPG

Problems, Complications, Modifications

It’s rather ridiculous to take the 12V DC from the Powerlet plug and through an inverter change it to 120V AC only to use the laptop adapter to convert it back to 12V DC! With some more electronics knowledge I think a simple box that accomplishes this would be reasonable.

The Laptop + Battery are too big for the map bag, I have to disconnect the battery to use it, which is annoying. However I have the long life battery I think the normal battery would fit just fine.

The screen is hard to see in bright sunlight even at it’s brightest setting.

These new Wacom tablets are supposed to work just as a touch screen without needing the pen tablet. I have not been able to get that to work yet though.

Power wise, I need to devise some sort of quick connect system so the tank bag can be disconnected quickly.

The DeLorme Streets and Trips program is buggy, at the tall resolution of the tablet, the zoom out button is off screen.

www.matus1976.com - Philosophy, Science, Politics, Art

www.ergoslope.com - Ergonomic Add On Desktop

www.Lifeboat.com - Lifeboat Foundation - Safeguarding Humanity

Science, HistoryApril 3, 2009 4:20 am

Day two of Italy and Greece started out with the vatican City. Prior to that, however, was one of the low points of the trips, the miserable event that Italians apparently call ‘breakfast’, which, at this hotel, consisted entirely of bread. Where’s my eggs? Bacon? Protein? MEAT? Yikes. Every morning it was what variety of stale cold bread would you like to call ‘breakfast’ Everyone on the trip was heartily disappointed, and even the tour director said it was unusual. Across the hall a large Japanese tour group routinely enjoyed eggs and bacon. To be fare to our Italian hosts, apparently it was EF that skimped us on our ‘continental’ breakfast. Maybe I’m just an annoying American…but bread only?

We took the Metro and got off at the vatican Museum stop, walked a few blocks to the entrance to the walled vatican City. This grayed off section from this Google maps screen shot shows the outline of vatican city.

vcity_1.jpg

The satellite perspective of the Google maps view doesn’t give a good appreciation of the scale of the wall surrounding this vatican City, though this image comes close. Notice the cars in the right hand side.

vcity_3.jpg

Another google street view image helps appreciate the scale of this wall.

vcity_4.jpg

The vatican city is a sovereign city-state with a population of about 900 on a 110 acre complex that is completely landlocked. It represents the smallest country in the world. Brought into it’s present form by treaty in 1929, it was a refuge for Christianity during the middle ages and the home of Emperor Nero’s circus (in ancient Rome, the circus was a loop in a stadium which chariots would race around) A great fire erupted in Rome under the reign of Nero, which some historians suggest he started, and others stories report he sat joyfully playing his liar on a rooftop while watching the city burn. Nero blamed Christians, a minority cult at that time, for the fire, and many were persecuted in this square. Tradition holds that Saint Peter was crucified in that circus, upside down at his request to be distinguished from his lord. Near the circus was a cemetery which Saint Peter was buried in and today St. Peters Basilica sits on top of his likely burial site.

We entered in the Northern part, near the museum. This Google street view shows the entrance we came upon and the medieval wall surrounding the whole vatican City.

vcity_2.jpg

This impressive doorway was the old entrance to the vatican city and Museum. That is some of our group passing in front of me. (on to my pictures now)

P1000218.jpg

We didn’t get to go in that cool door though, and instead went into this one, the ‘new’ entrance.

vcity_5.jpg

Passing quickly through the museum, some of us hit the ATM’s and others the Bathrooms, then we passed into this courtyard inside the city.

vcity_6.jpg

The adjacent building had fantastic renaissance styling.

P1000219.JPG

a close up of the work

zoom_1.jpg

Looking south down the courtyard off the balcony were the gardens, which were not open to the public, and in the distance, looming large and hazy, was the dome of St. Peter’s Basilica, one of the most fantastic buildings in the world. From this view the basilica is about 1,300 feet away.
P1000220.jpg

We turned around and started toward this round building, another impressive piece of renaissance architecture.

pine_01.jpg

We went back inside and passed one building’s width away

vcity_7.jpg

And emerged into the ‘pinecone’ courtyard into this view

P1000222.jpg

P1000223.jpg

A close up
zoom_3.jpg

The pinecone in the center was a symbol of fertility and life to Romans, and is a bronze from the 1st century AD, originally part of a Roman fountain. A nice view of the building surrounding the pinecone and the niche which emphasizes it.

P1000224.jpg

zoom_4.jpg

zoom_5.jpg

Most of this courtyard was constructed in the high renaissance period. The first two stories of this was designed and built by the Italian architect Bramante. The design came from scholarly reconstructions of the Roman temple Fortuna Primigenia.

fortuna_primigenia.jpg

Dying before it’s completion, the third story and the vast half dome, an interesting piece of negative space, was built forming the largest niche that had been built since antiquity.

In the center of the courtyard was a large metal sphere, broken and rotating.

Pomodorovaticansphere.jpg

The broken and fragmented sphere, according to the tour guide, represented the fracturing in the world that came from the protestant reformation going on at the time the basilica was constructed. The sphere, ugly, out of place, and non objective, was obviously a recent addition as only ‘modern’ artists would call it art. Though obviously requiring technical mastery and a very unique complex piece of work, it’s theme and manner of achieving it are hardly more than a Roarsarch test and stand in ugly stark contrast to the romantic realism of classical art that fills the courtyard and the vatican city.

According to the tour guide, the spherical work of art is the same size of the sphere that adorns the top of the dome of St. Peters Basilica. In this shot I tried to capture both to help get that sense of scale.

P1000225.jpg

zoom_6.jpg

An interesting façade and building in the courtyard, St. Peters again looms in the distance.

P1000226.jpg

zoom_8.jpg

the courtyard was adorned with Roman artifacts and artwork. I love this stuff, can’t get enough of it.

P1000227.jpg

zoom_9.jpg

zoom_10.jpg

P1000228.jpg

P1000229.jpg

A good view of the courtyard pinecone and niche

P1000231.jpg

After that, we headed inside through some of the elaborate galleries and hallways.

P1000232.JPG

zoom_11.jpg

It was popular during the renaissance era for wealthy people to collect roman artifacts, and the pope, being the wealthiest, of course had the best collection. We were rushed through this hallway with hundreds of artifacts which I could have spent days in alone, I tried to grab some of the best picutres. This sarcophagas is made of an extremely rare red marble.

P1000233.JPG

zoom_12.jpg

zoom_13.jpg

zoom_14.jpg

Turning the corner, more elaborate halls and stairs.

P1000235.JPG

More Roman Artwork
zoom_15.jpg

P1000241.JPG

P1000249.JPG

***************

I wonder what that toe or finger was to?

More elaborate halls

***************

What a great piece this is, Roman art, as we’ll see more of in Pompeii, celebrated existence. Here great art celebrates the intellect, the thinking man.

***************

I want a sarcophagus like this

Some of the halls had elaborate decorations such as these adorning the curved cielings.

Taking a close look though, almost ubelievably, these are painted to appear 3 dimensional, the surface is perfectly smooth. These guys who painted these are masters.

After passing, or, getting shoved through, the great hall of Roman artwork, we entered a hall of tapestries, which was quite impressive.

These tapestries, as this picture shows, were huge. The smallest was probably 15 x 15, the largest had to be 50 or 60 feet on it’s longest dimension. And these were woven

After the tapestries, we entered a hall of maps.

This was meant to be a center of information regarding the territories governed by the Pope that he could peruse down as sort of a giant reference hall. Pretty impressive. In this case, the ceiling was actually adorned with sculptures, and not just painted to look 3D. The elaborate nature of it struck everyone with awe.

************

zoom_28.jpg

I resolve to have a similar hall of maps to appreciate my empire with

P1000256.JPG

The paintings though not geographically accurate were represenationally accurate

P1000256.JPG

More of the incredible Ceiling in the hall of maps

P1000257.JPG

This map, labeled ETRvRIA was a region of northern italia where the Etruscan’s, predecessors to the Roman’s, hailed from.

P1000258.JPG

P1000259.JPG

P1000260.JPG

Some fantastic artwork adorning an entrance.

P1000261.JPG

zoom_30.JPG

A damn cool hall way. I don’t feel important enough to walk such a hallway.
P1000263.JPG

********** ************

These long building gracing the sides of the courtyard housed the halls of maps, tapestries, and roman artwork.

vcity_09.JPG

vcity_10b.jpg

After the halls, we emerged into an outside area impressive of it’s own right.

stp0264.jpg

I think this was the courtyard we emerged into

vcity_11b.jpg

stp0265.jpg

P1000271.JPG

zoom_31.jpg

Through the arch, looking up, heading outside

P1000273.JPG

zoom_32b.jpg

Emerging into St. Peter’s square

stp0274.jpg

**********

We take a quick right, avoiding the square and staying under a large elaborate portico

P1000275.JPG

P1000276.JPG

P1000277.JPG

The important people’s door

zoom_33.jpg

Look at those capitals, how long does it take to carve something like that?

zoom_34.jpg

We swing out of the portico into the square to get in a line. The portico was the entrance to St. Peters Basilica so we’re getting ready to enter. In this shot, the renaissance architecture of the lower building is captivating, along with the elaborate statues adorning it’s top. Our tour guide tells us the rustic 2 story-ish building at an oblique angle to the sandstone colored lower one is the home of the Pope, and the window at the far right is the one he emerges from to wave at the people.

P1000278.JPG

Googling the “Pope’s Window” I think it was one building off. These two pictures give a good idea of the building the window is a part of.

PopeWindow.JPG

And this image you can see both windows in the same view. That building was hidden behind this one from this perspective, but probably just barely, so perhaps from the tour guide’s point of view the ‘Pope’s Window’ was visible.

popes_window_1.JPG

The other side of the courtyard, while we are still in line

P1000279.JPG

Turning around the façade to St. Peter’s Basilica utterly overwhelms you

P1000280.JPG

************

That was all we got to see of the facade for now, we turned and headed toward the door, we are about to enter.

And inside…Wow!

Incredible

zoom_38.jpg

The design beliegh’s the scale. Look at the size of the people near the columns to be reminded of it
zoom

Incredible ceiling

Me in the basilica (front lower left)

A little history and architecture. As Christianity rose to dominance in the Roman Empire, the empire split into an east and west region. For various reasons which have been debated for centuries, from a change in the philosophical attitude of the people due to Christianity to weather changes, the western Roman empire fell, while the east remained with it’s capital at Constantinople for some centuries before it too fell. Emperor Constantine declared Christianity the official religion of Rome and made Constantinople the center of the eastern roman empire, and commenced construction of Byzantium Basilicas to replace the Roman Temples of the pagan days. The Hagia Sophia in Istanbul (formerly Constantinople) is the oldest and greatest of these Byzantium Basilicas.

Byzantian Basilicas were typically Greek crosses (a plus sign, not a t) and were characterized in the Roman era by Roman arches, large domes at the crossing and mosaic or fresco artwork. With the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of medieval Christendom, the Basilica gave way to the Cathedral, characterized by gothic arches (tall pointed arches) the Latin cross, stained glass instead of mosaics and frescos, and spires as bell towers, often asymmetric, at the entrance (think of Notre Dame).

Lacking the cement and mortar the Romans had, gothic cathedrals had to be self supporting and self stabilizing, making domes much harder to construct. The dome of the cross gave way to the height of the spires and the flying buttresses used to provide a counter force to the arches on arches used to achieve the incredible heights of cathedrals. The floor plan of the basic basilica was an even legged Greek cross, with St. Peters basilica, we saw an architectural revival of the Basilica (this was, after all, centuries after the height of gothic cathedral architecture) with the dome getting revived as the crown of the cross but retaining the Latin cross. This renaissance and reformation embroiled era of Christianity sought to distinguish itself from the Gothic era by, in part, reviving the basilica and dome.

I think to fully appreciate these pictures of St. Peter’s, it’s useful to know the structure and layout, to get a full sense of the monumental nature of the work. The earliest plan for the new Basilica was proposed by Bramante, and was a standard Greek Cross

St. Peters was a venerated site with a vast sacred earky Christian basilica built originally by Emperor Constantine. But by the renaisance era it was crumbling and in disarray, famously during once mass a wall crumbled and killed dozens of people. The Pope felt it was time to tear the old church down and build a better one.

Here is the first famous design of the new Basilica, by the famous artist Bramante. Though a great artist, he was a terrible engineer. The thin walls could never support the dome intended.

The famous renaissance artist Rapheal took Bramante’s plan and changed it to a latin cross, but seemed to have cluttered it with numourous colums and pilasters.

And subsequently Michaelengo further refined the design, reverting back to the greek cross, but extended the nave and finalizing the outer walls. The plan was returned to a latin cross, but otherwise retained all of Michaelengo’s contributions, by a later architect. The new dome was started in 1506, not completed until 1626. Michaelengelo spent the last 17 years of his life as the supreme architect on the project, over 30,000 drawings governed it’s construction.

Michaelangelo’s plan, with walls now able to handle the weight of the large dome, but with the disproportionately large facade from a later architect added

michaelangelo_1.jpg

stpeters_1.jpg

plan-michelangelo-1547.jpg

In my pictures above, we stand at the base of the long leg of the cross. Some more interior pictures.

zoom_43.jpg

These statues are 12 – 16 feet tall

heading over to michaelengo’s la pieta

This was one of the works I was most interested to see, part of the spark of the renaissance, it raised the bar on all art and necessarily technical mastery. More than that, it’s a powerful work. But you couldn’t get anywhere near enough to it to actually appreciate it, very dissapointing.

Now were starting to walk toward the center of the cross, under the dome, but were still in the long leg of it.

A view I liked

Now we start to reach the dome, looking up.

It’s impossible for your mind to wrap around the sheer scale of this structure, it never looks as big as it actually is. Obviously pictures do it little justice, but even being there it was like one grand optical illusion. I don’t think we evolved with the ability to conceptualize scales like this, since we rarely would come across them, and most important to our survival would be scales around our own immediate size.

Here is a shot with the incredibly elaborate Altar that the Pope occupies

I wish I had done a little bit of video here, just of walking, so you could see the parallax shift (or lack there of) that helps give the sense of scale.

Closeup of the alter

More of the Dome, I’m still staring up, captivated

looking down the cross toward the apse

Elaborate work at the end of the apse

One of my favorite shots

Another one like it

stp0314.jpg

This wide angle panoramic shot hosted on wikipedia is worth a look, though it takes some time to download, it helps capture the elaborate beauty and scale of the interior
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/vatican_Altar_2.JPG

Ok, just to try to appreciate the scale of this structure, take a close look at this picture

P1000311.JPG

Zooming in, you can actually see the people on the balcony in the dome.

zoom_48.jpg

Those letters surrounding the dome must be 12′ tall, the large round paintings in the pendantives must be 50 or 60 feet in diameter!

The overall dimensions of the basilica are 730 feet long, 500 feet wide, and 452 feet tall. The dome of the Basilica is indeed the tallest dome in the world, and as famously called, the greatest dome in all of christendom! 452 feet tall is roughly 45 stories. By contrast, the Statue of liberty, INCLUDING its base, is 305 feet tall, and could indeed stand, on it’s pedestal, INSIDE the dome. I would say this dome and the original façade of the basilica are properly considered to be the culmination of Michelangelo’s architectural genius.

P1000315.JPG

Though not known as much for his architecture and engineering as he was for sculpting and painting, Michaelangelo’s Architecture has had a much more direct influence on all architecture since than his sculpture has for artist.

Here is a plan shaded view of the dome with standard 10’ stories present for reference. Again, the scale of this structure is tremendous and completely escapes grasping it in these pictures, and pretty much even while you are there inside it.

plan_view_floors.jpg

The World Trade Center, at 110 Stories, was a little more than twice the height of St. Peters Basilica! Note that this dome was completed in 1626. One of the reasons that it is so difficult to ascertain scale on these structures was the common renaissance practice to make things look, intentionally, like fewer stories than they actually were. From the horizontal articulation and window plans, one might guess from a quick glance that the Basilica is about 6 stories tall, since we assume a window equals one story. But each of the windows in the façade of the basilica alone are probably 6 stories tall!

P1000316.JPG

P1000324.JPG

If you were to actually articulate the external walls with conventional window spacing, the scale is more apparent.

basilica_windowed.jpg

windowed_3.jpg

Finally, Me, in front of the Basilica, from the courtyard.

P1000314.JPG

Well, that’s it for part 1 of day 2

Science, Politics, HistoryMarch 28, 2009 2:28 pm

Off to Italy and Greece! We met at a parking lot in Mystic, jumped on a bus and headed to JFK. We had 35 people in the group, from high schoolers to retirees. The trip and boarding was uneventful. I spent a good amount of time getting to know others in the group as we had a few hours before take off at JFK. After a 7 hour flight over the Atlantic, were almost there! Just after departing at the layover in Frankfurt. With Lufthansa, I was expecting one of the new EU Airbus’s, but this was a Boeing 747. On our way to Rome, we passed over the Alps and the Appenine Ridge. I love passing mountain ranges from jet flights, but pictures never do it justice. About to Land in Rome! I was a little confused, I must have been on the wrong side of the plane, because this didn’t look like a big city at all. Turns out we landed about an hour outside of Rome in some beautiful Italian country side. We checked into our hotel, on the outskirts of the city. I was roomed with the father of one of the younger women on the trip, and not the person I was worried about rooming with. My friend from Illianos revealed to me I was originally roomed with him, and she’s been on the trips before and insisted to the organizer to not condemn me to that, knowing what this guy was like. Stories of him walking around in his underwear and toothpaste covered bathroom walls were floated about. I thanked her profusely! confessed my undying gratitude, and told her I’d buy her a drink at every meal. I knew none of the stories, just had the feeling he was those guys you know is going to be weird. Very nice guy, but definately weird. Decent view from our hotel room, but the Hotel was not at all impressive. As our tour host joked, it was a four star hotel but two of it’s stars were out. Apparently the EF Tours usually come up with much better stays. Floors 1 - 5 were electronic and accessible by elevators, floor 6 was stair access only and had old fashioned manual key locks. You were given one key per room, and asked to drop it off at the desk each time you left. We unpacked, relaxed for a bit, changed, showered, the all met for dinner. Here are some Random shots in Rome. After dinner, we made our way to the famous Spanish Steps, a popular meeting place in Rome which had a spectacular Ambience. I think if I lived here, I’d hang out here frequently. At the top was an old Egyptian obelisk From the very top, you could see the lighted dome of St. Peters Basilica, probably about 4 miles away. Looking down the steps to the street and fountain Me at the steps The fountain at the base was beautiful, the public fountains in Italy all have continuously fed clean water and are allegedly drinkable, though none of us tested the claim. We walked on, I found it odd there was an American Federal style building deep in Rome. This style was popular with the rise of American Federalism after the Revolutionary war, where American style was trying to distance itself from colonial and classical revival. And another one, attractively lit Walking the streets of Rome we came across a random church that was quite intriguing. Then it was one to the famous Trevi Fountain. Rounding a corner, the elaborate façade comes into view. Me in front of the Trevi Fountain. Closer detail of the elaborate marble carvings I liked this view And this one A close up of the center of the fountain This church sat behind the Trevi Fountain The elaborate Corinthian capitals were impressive A close up The front of the church was gated, and had all these small locks on it. I asked the Tour guide what the deal with that was. Lovers, he said, would come and put the locks on the gate together, supposedly their love would last forever, or as long as the lock remained. He said periodically the city comes and cuts them all off. So much for symbolism. We all enjoyed some Gelatio (Ice Cream) at the fountain. Seeking out Gelatio became a popular sport during our stay in Italy. A Random statue at the corner of a random building I spied an ancient looking temple façade down a side street, turns out we’d see it later though. We headed to a random church on reports about the interior of it from someone in the group Note the size of the pedestrians about to enter The inside was indeed incredible There was a service going on, so we quietly looked around. The pictures don’t do it justice. That’s a small choir all the way at the end, to help give a sense of scale. The walls are elaborate marble columns supporting giant Roman arches and the whole ceiling was elaborately painted. This was a random ‘small’ church in Rome, and was impressive and awe inspiring. Throughout the trip, these churches would inspire mixed emotions in me. While their technical skill and achievement is amazing and worthy of worship on their own, like a skilled artist choosing a bad theme, what they were made in the name of, and how the resources were acquired to make them, bothered me as much as the admiration of achievements required to make them inspired reverence in me. Off to the side was this interesting model. Someone asked at another church if this model represented something that someone wanted to actually build. I doubt it, given the sheer scale of it, but the tour guide said it was.

That dome would have exceeded by 10 fold anything built up until then, and probably exceeded anything ever built. The temples surrounding the outside looked to be replicas of existing famous temples. If these are to scale, the size of this structure would be almost beyond comprehension. Off to the side was this incredible structure And this one beside it A closer look reveals amazing sculptures Next to those, another just as impressive We quietly left the church, and a few blocks later was the Roman Pantheon!!! The sheer scale of it is hard to capture. Here I am standing in front of it The columns alone are a good 5 stories tall, and made of single pieces of granite. Probably 8 feet in diameter at the base. How the Romans even moved these, let alone put them into a standing position without breaking them is perplexing. I’m not sure what the inscription reads, but the Pantheon was built on top of the ruins of a previous temple to a Roman general, called Agrippa, so it looks to be something in honor of that. It was closed at night, but we would be returning the next day, and the inside was far more amazing. Next we passed the same ancient temple façade that was visible earlier. A few blocks away, we visited Hadrean’s Column. Built in the first century AD, by the famed Roman architect Appollodorus. After that, it was back to the metro and about a half hour ride and half hour walk to the hotel Some thoughts on Rome and Italy. One thing that immediately jumped out was the vast prevalence of motorcyclists and scooters. Lane splitting was almost a requirement, quiet a contrast to the states where only California allows lane splitting. Scooters and bikes could go and park pretty much anywhere they could fit. This area of Italy, at least, must have 10 or 20 times the motorcycle ridership that the states had. The weather and narrow roads surely is partly responsible for that, the terrain was full of small hills and charming alluring twisty roads, but the absurdly high gas prices was no doubt the primary reason. Geologically most of the land and stone outcroppings were a light sandstone, and the houses all had dark red terracotta roofs, contrasted with the lush green of the landscape they all made for a rich and very different landscape.

Philosophy, ScienceDecember 18, 2008 3:28 am


Objectivists consider Life as the objective standard of morality, the basis of ethical judgment.  Anything which harms life is evil, anything which is beneficial to life is good.  Now by “Life” objectivists do not mean the mere mechanical perpetuation of existence, but a particular kind of life, a fulfilling Aristotlean Eudaemonic life proper to rational beings living in the real world in voluntary co-operation with other rational beings.  Those beings must have goals, values, and engage in a productive course in life to achieve that which they value and not be co-dependant or exploitative.  Someone who values their mechanical existence over their ‘good life’ will find himself quickly betraying those things that make life enjoyable for the sake of things that allow him to exist, leading in a perpetual spiral toward a less meaningful existence.  Rand clarifies this as ‘Life qua Man’ that is, the thing’s proper to life in the context of an individual’s values and Man’s nature.  

 

Nihilistic skeptics, atheists, and philosophers throughout the ages have insisted that there is no such thing as an ‘objective’ morality.  Theists will make a claim that the word of god handed down as moral commandments are in fact an ‘objective’ basis for morality, and in their case they use ‘objective’ to mean something like ‘absolute’ and ‘irrefutable’ in this their use of the term objective has infiltrated the skeptical philosophers, like Michael Shermer, using the religious definition of objective also insists there is no ‘objective’ basis for morality and justifies this by saying how can you say this or that is right or wrong, according to what?  Shermer misunderstands ‘objective morality’ when he uses this a criticism of Objectivism, as if Objectivism has identified through revelation the one true morality, instead of identifying the only one proper to rational beings in the real world.  

 

But when theists use ‘objective’ morality they hijack the concept of truth and deliberation through reason and usurp it with revealed dogma.  To them, ‘objective’ morality is something that demands obedience no matter what and achieves it only through an omniscient omnipotent being as revealed through an elite aristocratic few only possible to those few.  But skeptics are wrong to use this as the idea for ‘objective’ morality.  We do not say that the ‘objective’ mass of 1 cubic centimeter of water is 1 g because it is announced by the fabric of space-time or decreed by an omniscient being and revealed through divination.  They are ‘objective’ because they are the product of reason, logic, and observation.  Objective in the context of science is something that is strived for that is removed from subjective interpretation and bias.  An “Objective” morality is not something ingrained into the fabric of the universe in the sense that it can be deduced through Newton’s laws of motion or quantum mechanics, as skeptics seem to think is a requirement for morality to be objective, (in doing so rendering the very concept of objective pointless) but it is objective in the sense that it is removed from subjective interpretation or bias, it is objective because it is the natural logical consequence of the laws of physics and the nature of rational beings that exist in a real universe.  

 

Liberals are still confused about this, theists have it easy, they look it up in their book, argue a little about interpretation, then decree something as ‘objectively’ immoral.  But nothing that only an elite few have access to who provide official interpretations is ‘objective’, it is not something discernable by any person using their mind, reason, and observation - as anything that is called ‘objective’ should by definition be.  Liberals aren’t sure where to go, they know that, for instance, killing someone is wrong, but not sure if it is right to say someone in another country is wrong to kill someone else when their culture makes it ok, such as ‘honor killing’, the inhumane treatment of the ‘untouchables’ in India, etc.  Richard Dawkins wrestles with this contradiction in ‘the God Delusion’ where he associates religious indoctrination with child abuse, but then is a little confused about what that demands of him morally, if one is witnessing child abuse, expending a reasonable amount of energy to stop it is moral to him, so if a country is indoctrinating children with a hate filled ideology, abusing them essentially, it should be morally defensible to remove from power the tyrants of that nation.  But this get’s in the way of the moral relativism, ‘tolerance’ and ‘multi-culturalism’ liberals profess so strongly (but rarely extend to inhabitants of their own nation who hold different opinions!)

 

Some Liberals though, I realized, do have an objective basis for morality, which they seemingly adopt whole heartedly, that of environmentalism.  In the way that Life qua Man is the objective standard of morality to Objectivists, some vague platonic ideal abstraction of a pure and pristine environment is the objective standard of morality to liberal environmentalists.  Whatever nation, culture, or creed, regardless of multi-culturalism and ‘tolerance’, if you’re burning down trees, killing cuddly animals, or dumping trash in rivers, all that bottled up moral rage and condemnation that liberals have been holding comes billowing forth.  Now, you could be killing people because of their ethnicity, holding the people in your nation as literal hostages and running it like a prison camp, etc, but moral condemnation is sparse.  They just say “who are we to say they are wrong” or “That’s just their culture”  But if you’re burning coal, forget it!  You are the incarnate of all that is evil!

 

This falls right into line with the growing criticism that environmentalism is just filling the psychological void of religious thought that secularism in the west has left gaping wide open.  It has their garden of Eden – “Sustainability”, the fall of man from that where everyone lived in blissful harmony with nature (and not the painful disgusting short brutish lives they actually lived), it’s emotional disregard for facts, it’s original sin, and now, it’s ‘objective’ basis for morality.  

 

One might try to argue that environmental degradation affects everyone and that’s why it’s morally objectionable to everyone everywhere, but this argument fails for two reasons. First it implies that unless something directly affects ME then I make no moral judgment on it, so what if you’re raping my next door neighbor!  In fact an assault on any person on the planet is an assault on everyone’s rights because leaving it alone promulgates a world where that kind of thing is ok, where rights in general are not respected.  It is always in your best interest to oppose the assault and infringement on rights any where in the world, because when you do not it will always, eventually, come back to bite you.  Which leads to the second, the harm which comes from the promulgation of murderous tyranny, which is so often ignored because of ‘multi-culturalism’ and things like ‘self determination’ (as if a small group of thugs getting hundreds of billions in weapons from an expansionistic murderous tyranny like the Soviet Union and using that to enslave and force to war an entire nation, such as was the case of Vietnam, was anything remotely like ‘self determination’) is far more detrimental to your average person’s well being than coal power is.  While it is true that these kinds of nations, the most unjust when life is your standard of morality, are also the worst polluters, it is also very true that they are the source and primary fuel for aggression, democide, famines, wars, terrorism, and pandemics.  

 

At the end of WWI, Winston Churchill insisted that British Troops assist the Czars in defending themselves against the revolution which brought Lenin and communism to power, but the war weary west labeled him a war monger.  Less than a thousand troops took the Czars with little resistance.  It is said that in the making of a movie some years later glorifying the revolution more people were injured than in the actual revolution itself.  A little opposition may have gone a long way, but instead what rose to power was the most murderous tyranny in the history of humanity.   At the end of WWII, Winston Churchill again warned that we should move on the Soviet Union, while it is now at it’s weakest, and they again called him a war monger, and so we were thrust into an existential prisoners dilemma game with a murderous expansionistic tyranny that brought the entire world to the brink of complete nuclear annihilation.  

 

It was not the Soviet Union’s dirty coal plants or poorly designed nuclear power plants that killed 60 million people this century (more than twice as many as were killed in World War II) and motivated the invasion of 1/3rd of the nations on the planet, thrusting dozens into civil wars and perpetual slavery.  It was not the emissions of the crematoriums in Auschwitz that did not meet EPA guidelines that enabled Hitler to kill 20 million Jews, Gypsies, ‘unfits’ and homosexuals (incidentally, Stalin killed more Jews than Hitler did, but he just killed them along with other people, so it was not ‘genocide’ in the eyes of the semantically obsessed morally confused west)  It was not raping the earth for steel that started the most dreadful war in all of humanity, it was the alliance of two militaristic tyrannical xenophobic megalomaniacal cultures and one merely power hungry expansionist culture.  It was appeasement, indifference, moral relativism, isolationism, and utopian wishful thinking that ignored these murderous tyrannies and every reasonable warning sign until too late that wreaked this havoc upon humanity and the inhabitants of the world, and it will be those same characteristics that will wreak havoc upon humanity and indeed all life on earth in the future. 

ScienceDecember 6, 2008 6:14 pm

What is fusion? What elements are involved in this reaction in the sun?
(Another YahooAnswer of mine to a good question)

Fusion is the name of the nuclear reaction where one or more nucleons (a proton or a neutron) combine to form a larger atomic nuclei.

The smallest and simplest atom is Hydrogen, with a single proton making up it’s nucleus. When two protons are brought close enough together so that they almost touch, a force called the ’strong nuclear force’ pulls them together tightly, and in the process releases energy in the form of light, kinetic energy, and a positron (the anti-matter equivalent of an electron).

The new atom however is not made up of two protons, one of the protons decays into a neutron by releasing a positron (that is how it loses it’s electrical charge) This new atom, made up of a proton and a neutron, is still a form of Hydrogen, but it is an isotope called deuterium. So when two protons fuse, they create deuterium, this is the start of the major reactions in stars the mass of our sun or less, called the Proton-Proton Chain.

The protons have an electrostatic positive charge so they repel each other. It is the heat and gravitational pressure of the sun that get individual protons close enough together so that the strong nuclear force exceeds the electrostatic repulsive force. It turns out that the equivalent of over 100 pounds of force need to be applied to each individual proton to overcome the electrostatic repulsion. And even in a large star like our sun, the mass and heat are actually still not enough to make two protons fuse together.

Before the era of quantum mechanics this was a big mystery. But it was soon realized that sub atomic particles like protons can undergo an effect called ‘quantum tunneling’ which enables it to pass through barriers that classical physics would not allow. The smaller the energy barrier the more likely the particle will tunnel through it. The large energy barrier still preventing proton-proton fusion in the sun makes the tunneling a rare event, but there are so many protons that enough are tunneling at any moment to fuse and start the fusion chain in the sun.

This is a very important reaction in the sun and all stars with long lives because it essentially limits the rate at which the star can consume it’s fuel. It takes about 10 billion years for two proton to get close enough to each from quantum tunneling to fuse in a star like our sun.

Once two protons have been brought close enough together through random quantum mechanical fluctuations enabling a fusion reaction, a steady supply of deuterium is created. As soon as there is any deuterium in the sun the heat and gravitational pressure are enough to cause fusion reactions. At this point, there are many different reactions which take place, in some a proton fuses with a deuterium atom, in other cases two deuterium will fuse to create helium. Helium can then fuse with either individual protons, deuterium, or another helium to make larger elements. The types of available reactions increase rapidly and other elements like Boron, Beryllium, and Lithium are produced and also take place in still more reactions. Three helium nuclei can fuse to create a carbon atom.

In this way larger and larger atoms are created, but the dominant energy in stars the size of our sun come from the proton-proton chain reaction. In large stars, the Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen cycle dominates.

Very large stars can burn through there fuel very quickly, and some stars after they consume their fuel and lose the outward pressure from the fusion reaction that balances their inward gravitational pressure, suddenly collapse initiating a runaway series of nuclear reactions, like a nuclear bomb the size of a star. These are supernovae explosions and for a few minutes can create more light and energy than entire galaxies. It is these explosions that fuse smaller elements like carbon into larger ones like iron, aluminum, and uranium. These explosions throw these heavy elements out into space, and those elements later collect and form rocks, then asteroids, then planets, and all the things that live on the planets. That is why, in the immortal words of the famous scientist Carl Sagan, we are all made of ‘Star Stuff’

Further Reading:

The Proton - Proton chain
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hba

Quantum Tunneling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tun

Proton Proton fusion in the sun
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hba

The CNO Cycle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNO_cycle

Supernova
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova

ScienceDecember 5, 2008 1:34 am


Why does fusion create more energy than fission?

The answer lies in the difference in energy of the nucleus of a small atom which would be fused, and a large atom which would be split. When two small elements are brought to together, each individual nucleon (proton or neutron) are much closer to the nucleons they fuse to. Since the strong nuclear force which holds nucleons together extends over a very short range, In a large element like Uranium (235 nucleons) any typical nucleon might only be bound to a few neighboring nucleons, while in a small element virtually all the nucleons are bound by the strong nuclear force to another nucleon. So the total amount of ‘binding’ energy in a larger atomic nucleus will be smaller than the binding energy in a small nucleus. As you bring more small nucleus atoms together the binding energy increases, but as the size of the atom increases more of the nucleons become further apart from the rest in the nucleus, and eventually the electrostatic repulsion force of the protons exceeds the strong nuclear attractive force and the binding energy levels off. As the atom gets larger, they become unstable and the binding energy decreases.

So when you fission a large element into two smaller, but still large elements, the binding energy of any particular nucleon is lower, and the number of nucleons effected with respect to the total number in the system is smaller. When you fuse smaller atoms, all of the nucleons feel the strong nuclear force to each, and they are all much closer to each other, so the binding energy is much higher. A shorter quick way to think of it might be the ‘binding density’ (binding energy per nucleon) in a large fissionable atom is much lower than the ‘binding density’ in a small fissionable atom.

More info
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/nucbin.htmlc1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_energy

Politics, History, EmotionsNovember 12, 2008 3:27 am

Widowed and alone, suffering the grief of losing four of his six children and his wife, the great American mind Thomas Jefferson fell in love with the married and devout catholic Maria Cosway in France.  They spent a month together picnicking and traveling the French country side.  When she left, Jefferson was devastated.  He wrote a dialog attempting to make sense of it. 

Madam seated by my fireside solitary and sad, the following dialog took place between my head and my heart.

Head – well friend, you seem to be in a pretty trim

Heart – I am indeed the most wretched of all earthly beings, overwhelmed by grief

Head – This is one of the scrapes for which you are ever leading us, you must learn to look forward before taking a step which may interest our peace

Heart – let the gloomy monk sequestered from the world seek un-social pleasures in the bottom of his cell, had they ever felt the solid pleasure of one generous spasm of the heart, they would exchange for it all the frigid speculations of their lives

Head – do not bite at the bait of pleasure until you know there is no hook beneath it, the art of life is the art of avoiding pain

Heart – leave me to decide when friends are to be contracted, we have no rose without it’s thorn, no pleasure without ally

Head - those which depend on ourselves are the only pleasures which a wise man may count on, for nothing is ours which another may deprive us of